FISCAL AGENTS: Financial Services Group



Open the QuickNav window
Home
Search
Site Map
Contact

The Knowledge Bank

The Money Centre

The Learning Centre

Financial Tools

The Money Management Newsletter
General Interest
GICs / Fixed Income
RIF Planning
RSP Planning
Mutual Fund Investing
Savings
Managing Money
Choosing Fin.Services
Insurance Products
RESP Savings
Taxes / Estate Matters
Home Ownership
Companion Advisor
What The Papers Say
Product Reviews
E-Newsletter Archive
Front Page Archive
Subscription Services

Products and Services

The Radar Screen

About Us




Google

FiscalAgents.com
World Wide Web

Glossary of
Financial Terms
 

The Companion Advisor: General Interest
The ex-spouse, child support and the insurance policy



Marriage breakdown and the designation of beneficiaries of insurance policies often produce disastrous results. The recent Ontario case illustrates some of the pitfalls.

A mother and father separated in 1991 and divorced in 1992. The mother received custody of there 3 children. The father agreed to pay child support. In the separation agreement, he agreed to protect the support payments by life insurance policy on his life in the sum of $150,00 with his children designated as beneficiaries.

The father did not pay the child support and did not take out the life insurance as promised. He did take out a new insurance policy on his life for $300.000, naming his new common-law law wife the beneficiary.

In 1995, the father was driving with all 3 children in his vehicle. There was an accident. He and one child were killed. The other 2 children were badly hurt but survived.

As a result of his death, the common law wife was to receive benefits of $118,000 from the car insurance policy and $300,000 from the new life insurance policy. The mother, who had custody of the 2 surviving children and who was owed over $60,000 in unpaid child support and interest, was to receive nothing. Thus, on her behalf and on behalf of the 2 children, she sued the 2 insurance companies, the common law wife, and the estate for the child support arrears and the proceeds of the policy described in the separation agreement. Over a year later, a judge ruled in her favor.

The arrears were ordered to be paid from the 2 polices. The policies were charged with $150,000 to provide for the surviving children's support, the amount they would have received if their father had livid up to the terms of the separation agreement. The designation of his common law spouse as beneficiary did not protect the proceeds from claim, as some might expect.

There are lessons to be learned from this case.

1. Even though you have designated a beneficiary on an insurance policy, those proceeds are liable to be used to provide support for a child or other dependent if you have made inadequate provision for them on your death.

2. Read your separation agreement and make sure that you do what you have promised to do regarding placing and/or maintaining life insurance. If you go into a new relationship, do not automatically make your new partner the beneficiary of your policies and plans, without considering your legal obligations to your former family.

3. If you have separated and are not bound to designate the beneficiary to be your ex-spouse, consider changing the beneficiary and making a Will. Unless legally obliged, most people do not want their ex-spouse to be beneficiary. Separation or divorce does not automatically remove the spouse if he or she is the designated beneficiary. Most people prefer to have their children or other family member benefit but forget to change the designation.

4. Generally, an underage child should not be named directly as beneficiary of a life insurance policy. If the child is under 18 years when the death occurs, the proceeds are paid into court to be held until the child turns 18 when the child receives the funds. Or someone must apply on the child’s behalf. Better to name your Estate as beneficiary and make a Will setting up the appropriate trust for the child.

5. In this case, a year had passed and neither the children nor the common law wife had benefited from the policies in place. Get proper legal advice to make sure that you meet your obligations and avoid having your estate tied up by legal proceedings that keep insurance proceeds out of the hands of your chosen beneficiaries.

The information in this article is general and should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional advice in specific situations.

Suzanne Michaud is a lawyer with the Mississauga firm of Pallet Valo, working with clients and their other advisors in areas of estate planning and administration. (905) 273-3300

* * *

Use this link to load a printer-friendly
version of this document.

Do you want to share this page with someone else?
Send this page to
Sending
Format
Text
HTML
Your email address

Have a question regarding this article? Use our feedback form to send us a note.
BACK

© , Fiscal Agents Money Management Newsletter
25 Lakeshore Road, Oakville, On L6K 1C6.
(905) 844-7700

 





Fiscal Agents Home

Knowledge Bank Money Centre
Learning Centre Financial Tools
Newsletter Products & Services
Radar Screen
About Us

Legal | Site Map | Home | Search
Information on supported Internet Browsers
Mutual Fund Investments - Statutory Sales Disclosure Information

Copyright © 1984 - Fiscal Agents Financial Services Group


Questions? Comments?
Use our Feedback page to contact us.

 
Companion Advisor
General Interest
Debt you say?

Losing a family member provides an Inheritance

How can mortgage rates be going up when prime is coming down?

Regulator warns investors to steer clear of Ponzi-style investment schemes

Focus on the whole, not the parts

Women and finance: An ever-changing world

Revisit your financial plan when you inherit

Financial considerations when remarrying

Death, disability and the family business

The ex-spouse, child support and the Insurance policy

Can you afford to send your children to college?

Start counting your paycheques

Substitute Decisions Act

Boomernomics: How baby boomers' savings might boost financial assets

A tale of two booms

Myths and misconceptions in Ontario Family Law

The Cottage: Keeping it in your family



The Money Management Newsletter:
w
General Interest